Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 21:46:10 +0200 From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r250991 - in head: contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc include lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc Message-ID: <20130525194610.GA26980@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <201305251859.r4PIxChc053341@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201305251859.r4PIxChc053341@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 06:59:12PM +0000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Author: marcel > Date: Sat May 25 18:59:11 2013 > New Revision: 250991 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250991 > Log: > Make the malloc(3) family of functions weak and make their non-weak > implementations visible for use by applications. The functions $F that > are now weak symbols are: > allocm, calloc, dallocm, free, malloc, malloc_usable_size, > nallocm, posix_memalign, rallocm, realloc, sallocm > The non-weak implementations of $F are exported as __$F. > Submitted by: stevek@juniper.net > Reviewed by: jasone@, kib@ > Approved by: jasone@ (jemalloc) > Obtained from: juniper Networks, Inc Is it deliberate that the same treatment is not applied to aligned_alloc? -- Jilles Tjoelker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130525194610.GA26980>