Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:57:41 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h Message-ID: <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200401192127.i0JLRBL3041817@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040120175334.W3279@gamplex.bde.org> <20040213035557.M24031@gamplex.bde.org> <7mfzdexjzs.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:53:25 +1100 (EST),
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I also think that commit is not so useful, but there are some
> > supporters for his modification. Do you want to back out this
> > completely? Or fixing just style bugs are acceptable?
>
> Fixing the style bugs and other bugs, and adding an option (off by
> default) to control it would be acceptable. Backing it out would
> be easier.
I think an option which is off by default would not be accepted by
Poul-Henning.
I re-read all of this thread and collect opinions.
pls back out: bde,nate,wpaul,danfe@nsu.ru
good: phk,kientzle,grog
positive: silby
negative: jhb,kuriyama
This does not include private emails to Poul-Henning and I don't think
we should decide something with above. That's just FYI.
But I personally feel this should be back out after re-reading and we
should tackle traceback() improvements.
Sorry my stupid, but it seems everyone seems happy if traceback()
improvement happens. Is that really too hard to go forward?
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7m3c99vp6i.wl>