Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: LDT entries and WINE and Threads..
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307101030300.40558-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030710172123.GB634@galgenberg.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, 08.07.2003 at 14:06:51 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I'm looking at this and I think that my interpretation is that 
> > WINE, under FreeBSD, blindly allocates LDT entries starting at location 17,
> > without looking to see if they are in use already..
> > [...] 
> > comments?
> 
> This is not really your problem and not really related to LDT (I think),
> but WINE is not 100% functional on FreeBSD anyway.
> 
> Just cd to WRKSRC and do a 'gmake test' (and watch Wine deadlock three
> times)
> 
> I know that you have things far more important to look at, but I would
> be cool if you could give me a clue to what is going on there.
> 

I wouldn't know where to begin.. I just want to make sure that if
We use LDT entries in the threads package that we don't
clobber wine and visa versa..



> Cheers!
> 
> -- 
> FreeBSD	is the most powerful OS.
> NetBSD	is the most portable OS.
> OpenBSD	is the most secure OS.
> Linux	is the most popular OS.
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0307101030300.40558-100000>