Date: Thu, 8 Jun 95 17:47:28 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDi 2.0 binary compatibility question Message-ID: <9506082347.AA29785@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <95Jun8.163254pdt.49859@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Jun 8, 95 04:32:45 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In message <199506072228.SAA00374@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> you write: > > (I'd like to know why file(1) only prints 'ex' instead of 'executable.') > > because the phrase "BSD/386 demand paged (first page unmapped) pure ex\0" is > 50 bytes long, and /usr/src/usr.bin/file/file.h says Try: "BSD/386 demand paged (no 1st page) pure executable\0" Instead. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9506082347.AA29785>