Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:52:15 +1100 From: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Cody Holland <cholland@redmoonbroadband.com> Subject: Re: BSD vs Linux Threads Message-ID: <4392CA5F.1040502@roq.com> In-Reply-To: <20051202115651.GA1811@flame.pc> References: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F8316489986554676@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> <438FB8DD.8000106@roq.com> <20051202115651.GA1811@flame.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-12-02 14:00, Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> wrote: > > >>For 6 Linux threads from my benchmarking and from what I have seen >>some peoples posts gives poor performance compared to libthr or >>libpthread I am using more of libthr over libpthread in 6.0 and have >>been benchmarking best results. >> >>Try this in /etc/libmap.conf >>[mysqld] >>libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 >>libpthread.so libthr.so >> >> > >Unfortunately, "I have best results with libthr" is completely >worthless, unless you also describe the exact process of the >benchmark and why this particular benchmark is considered very >important for your specific application vs. other types of >workload :/ > > OK well to put it in another way libthr has beaten libpthread (and everything else you can do in FreeBSD such as linux threads) in ANY MySQL benchmark test I have done.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4392CA5F.1040502>