Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:38:52 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@FreeBSD.org>, "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/orsa Makefile Message-ID: <4DFA940C.2030909@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org> References: <201106162238.p5GMcfrV085514@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:38:41 +0000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> stephen 2011-06-16 22:38:41 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> astro/orsa Makefile >> Log: >> - Track updated dependency >> - Bump PORTREVISION > > Please remember to bump other ports that are affected by the math/GiNaC > shlib change. Already done. The only other port that uses math/GiNaC is math/octave-forge-symbolic, and that port was updated at the same time as math/GiNaC. I had actually thought about orsa at the time the GiNaC update was committed. The orsa port doesn't build on the i386 because the fftw dependency fails. But I should have considered the amd64 as well. Here is a question. Should I bump portrevision of math/octave-forge-symbolic anyway? Should one wait a day or so before committing the bumps to avoid certain "race" conditions with tinderbox, where it might build the port requiring the dependent before rebuilding the dependent? Thanks, Stephenhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DFA940C.2030909>