Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:38:52 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@FreeBSD.org>, "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/orsa Makefile Message-ID: <4DFA940C.2030909@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org> References: <201106162238.p5GMcfrV085514@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:38:41 +0000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> stephen 2011-06-16 22:38:41 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> astro/orsa Makefile >> Log: >> - Track updated dependency >> - Bump PORTREVISION > > Please remember to bump other ports that are affected by the math/GiNaC > shlib change. Already done. The only other port that uses math/GiNaC is math/octave-forge-symbolic, and that port was updated at the same time as math/GiNaC. I had actually thought about orsa at the time the GiNaC update was committed. The orsa port doesn't build on the i386 because the fftw dependency fails. But I should have considered the amd64 as well. Here is a question. Should I bump portrevision of math/octave-forge-symbolic anyway? Should one wait a day or so before committing the bumps to avoid certain "race" conditions with tinderbox, where it might build the port requiring the dependent before rebuilding the dependent? Thanks, Stephen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DFA940C.2030909>