Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:42:44 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS related panic (daily <-> find) Message-ID: <CAFHbX1KCynW-o5kTSzzZEChZ=ETqUodd4kHF_YyjQ0WTuYS0HQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131021.133036.045.1@DOMY-PC> References: <20130719.174511.786.3@DOMY-PC> <201310071212.05281.jhb@freebsd.org> <20131016.104912.479.1@DOMY-PC> <201310161650.52354.jhb@freebsd.org> <CA%2BtpaK23Wo8Nemi-xUy3-BZSUdeWkpWQh_o6Ws=mxi6jrbubvw@mail.gmail.com> <20131021.133036.045.1@DOMY-PC>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM, <rank1seeker@gmail.com> wrote: > If I can't use memtest86+-4.20, to determine failing module, then what is a > use of it at all? > Test RAM speed perhaps? You can't use it to prove that a stick is not faulty, but you can use it to prove that it is. 5 hours is perhaps not long enough to exercise the issue, or perhaps there is a different, longer, test suite you can choose. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1KCynW-o5kTSzzZEChZ=ETqUodd4kHF_YyjQ0WTuYS0HQ>