Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:12:21 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Vladimir Kravchuk <adm@smr.ru>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UP2000/DP264 Message-ID: <14517.40509.360595.957164@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002241308220.52985-100000@beppo.feral.com> References: <14517.39997.734455.74296@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002241308220.52985-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob writes: > fWIW, I see 2GB fine on an alpha 8200. > As do the TestDrive people on their XP1000. I think the problem might be that we unconditionally return 1 in pmap_uses_prom_console(). I might be missing something in a quick read, but I do not see how we can go back & read a second MDDT_SYSTEM cluster after we've read the first system cluster and physmem has been set to a non-zero value. I think this guy's problem might be that he's got his 2GB spread across 2 clusters with system tags. The patch I mailed him makes pmap_uses_prom_console return 0 in his case, which should allow the detection of a second system cluster. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14517.40509.360595.957164>