Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:30:26 +0100 From: Kai Wang <kaiwang27@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile) Message-ID: <20080221153026.GB1022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> In-Reply-To: <fpk4fa$gj0$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080221131209.GA2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221140247.GC2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221143351.GP57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <fpk4fa$gj0$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > Shall the crossbuild for CURRENT work on RELENG_[67] ? If not, this is a > > huge regression. > > Why wouldn't it, unless you're building amd64 CURRENT on i386 > RELENG_[67] or a similar combination? That's right... I didn't consider this situation before... Building amd64 CURRENT on i386 RELENG_[67] won't work. I'll see what I can do, I think we probably need revert back to let Binutils ar to handle the cross build. My Makefile knowledge is very poor, is there a way to let the build system use Binutils 'ar' in the building process but later install it as 'gar'? Thanks, -- Kai
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080221153026.GB1022>