Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:23:57 -0800 From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Gafgo <nicolas.gafgo@bredband.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Related Q: (was) Re: Newbie question Message-ID: <20040120182357.GB74976@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040120085925.GA44545@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <400B18A1.3050104@bredband.net> <20040120085925.GA44545@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:59:25AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > It sounds to me as if your new machine has hardware which is supported > under 5.x but not 4.9. That's a very good reason to install 5.2 -- > caveats about "early adopters" notwithstanding, by all accounts 5.2 is > turning out nicely. I'd worry about using it for a system that was > mission critical to a business (read: financial consequences if it > isn't up and running), but for a home system I think it would do very > well. > I'm going toput 5.2 on my new DNS server; but from scratch. SWondering how dificult it is to upgrade from 4.[78] to 5.[latest]. Is the UPGRADING file suffieient? I've heard the 5.X is the cat's meow.... tia, gary > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040120182357.GB74976>