Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:49:10 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>, "Terry Lambert" <tlambert@primenet.com>, "Jonathon McKitrick" <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: <crh@outpost.co.nz>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Judge: "Gates Was Main Culprit" Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.19991120214744.0424c3e0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <001e01bf31f2$02c70fb0$021d85d1@youwant.to> References: <199911181753.KAA15939@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:23 AM 11/18/1999 -0800, David Schwartz wrote: > > Yes. It required the ability to wield what is called "monopolistic > > power" in the marketplace. If you can wield this power, you can > > subvert normal free-market pressures, and by subverting, ignore them. > > Then why is it that not one single clear example of this has ever been >found? Just because you refuse to acknowledge them -- due either to ideology or the affiliation with Microsoft that I am now sure you have -- does not mean that many have not been found. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19991120214744.0424c3e0>