Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "Nielsen" <nielsen@memberwebs.com>
To:        "zhang jack" <jack_zhangcl@hotmail.com>, <bvi@itouchlabs.com>
Cc:        <security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: syncache testing
Message-ID:  <20020716142852.0475E43B39A@mail.npubs.com>
References:  <F82K7Rz66lKjo0pzeSz00015b1f@hotmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It would seem that the syncache firewall would actually have to handle the
TCP request. In otherwords you'd need a full fledged proxy which then
forwards the request to your real www servers.

Cheers

Nate

From: "zhang jack" <jack_zhangcl@hotmail.com>
> I have tested Ipfilter + syncache, it seems doesn't work.
>
> client 192.168.1.1
>   |
> __|_______ fxp0:192.168.1.2
>
>   Gateway
>
> __________ fxp1:10.0.0.1
>   |
>   |
> www server 10.0.0.2
>
> I make the rdr rule as:
> "rdr fxp0 192.168.1.2/32 port 80 -> 10.0.0.2 port 80"
> then I make syn flood to 192.168.1.2(on 192.168.1.1),
> the syncache seems no work:
> "net.inet.tcp.syncache.count: 0"
>
> Maybe I must use IPFW+Natd?
>
>
> Jack Zhang
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020716142852.0475E43B39A>