Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:47:01 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: "Vogel, Jack" <jack.vogel@intel.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: kern/165399: turn off port on SWITCH do not change status of igb Message-ID: <666251870.20120223194701@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <201202222040.q1MKe7ft065290@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201202222040.q1MKe7ft065290@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, Jack.
Вы писали 22 февраля 2012 г., 22:40:07:
VJ> The following reply was made to PR kern/165399; it has been noted by GNATS.
VJ> From: "Vogel, Jack" <jack.vogel@intel.com>
VJ> To: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>, "kes-kes@yandex.ru"
VJ> <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
VJ> Cc:
VJ> Subject: Re: kern/165399: turn off port on SWITCH do not change status of igb
VJ> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:07:34 +0000
VJ> --_000_BC1B13FD0226B0479C795193AC1B257204574EORSMSX104amrcorpi_
VJ> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
VJ> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
VJ>
VJ> This is not a bug, it's a side-effect of design. Until you bring the interf=
VJ> ace up interrupts are not enabled, hence there is no way to see and respond=
VJ> to the link change event. If you bring the port up just by doing an `ifcon=
VJ> fig igbX up` and try it again you'll see the status will change.
Ok, I agree with that that port do no reacion until it is 'UP'
but why it do reaction when port on switch is turned ON?
SW PORT is OFF ----------- status link is no carrier
SW PORT is ON ----------- status link is active
(why react despite on interrupts is off???)
SW PORT is OFF ----------- status link is active
(do not react because of interrupts is off)
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?666251870.20120223194701>