Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 13:12:35 -0800 From: Tom Czarnik <tom@athms.com> To: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> Cc: FreeBSD Security <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: IPFilter and new rc.conf scripts Message-ID: <3A50F2C3.BFCB550E@athms.com> References: <20010101034042.8685.qmail@web1003.mail.yahoo.com> <20010101152510.R253@speedy.gsinet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gerhard Sittig wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 19:40 -0800, echelon wrote: > > > > PR conf/22859 explains why ipf can't work on tun0 > > after reboot. So the ad-hoc solution is to put "ipf > > -y" in /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup. > > "ipf -y" is what you need in ppp.linkup -- as well as in > ppp.linkdown -- anyway as soon as you have dynamic IP addresses > on your tun* interfaces. So I wouldn't call this just "ad hoc" > but more "given almost by default and necessity". :) This will > make the 0.0.0.0/32 address in your rules work very much like > MYADDR in ppp(8) syntax does. Let me reiterate that the problem of IPF needing a resync affects BOTH tun and interfaces loaded as modules. It needs to be fixed in rc.network for both conditions, and only in ppp.linkup/down if you are using a dynamic address. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A50F2C3.BFCB550E>