Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:33:55 -0000 From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: danfe@nsu.ru Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/share/sgml release.ent Message-ID: <20031027.083317.54187409.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20031027093150.GA58637@regency.nsu.ru> <20031027030448.A67575@FreeBSD.org> <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru>
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> writes:
: On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:04:48AM -0800, Max Khon wrote:
: > Hello!
: >
: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:31:50PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
: >
: > > > bmah 2003/10/26 21:37:00 PST
: > > >
: > > > FreeBSD src repository
: > > >
: > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_9)
: > > > release/doc/share/sgml release.ent
: > > > Log:
: > > > The next release of FreeBSD will most likely be 4.9.1, according to
: > > > current RE plans.
: > >
: > > I'd like to see 4.10 someday though. 4.x set a de-facto standard WRT
: > > security, robustness, and overall excellent general- (and all-) purpose
: > > operating system. Seems like it deserves 10th incarnation. 8-)
: >
: > there will be problems if it will be called 4.10.
: > at least with __FreeBSD_version.
:
: Hmm, I seem to recall a conversation from where I've got an impression
: that in FreeBSD X.Y, Y can go from 0 through 9, 10, ..., 99 up to 100.
: I'll take a look closed at __FreeBSD_version, thanks.
in 5.x that's true, but in 4.x, only 0-9 were considered for Y. The
__FreeBSD_version will decode as 4.9.1, even if we call it 4.10.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031027.083317.54187409.imp>