Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:51:05 +1000 (EST) From: Rowan Crowe <rowan@sensation.net.au> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arplookup failed: Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110211248480.36258-100000@velvet.sensation.net.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110202244220.925-100000@veager.jwweeks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Jim Weeks wrote: > A traceroute from my server back to the offending machine travels through > my default gateway, which is how it should be, I think. Or shouldn't the > trace also show the gateway for the offending machine? Hello Jim, Are you able to trace back from the other end? That's what I was getting at. If you can't, then use tcpdump -e to compare ethernet addresses; see if the packets FROM the other server have the source ethernet address of your gateway. If not, then something is funny (like the host sending directly...) Cheers. -- Rowan Crowe camrecord.com / camdiscover.com / Sensation Internet Services Melbourne, Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0110211248480.36258-100000>