Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 10:47:08 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Didier Derny <didier@omnix.net> Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Yard/FreeBSD Problem (fwd) Message-ID: <199808171647.KAA06919@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980817163418.4938A-100000@omnix.net> References: <199808171348.GAA19588@implode.root.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980817163418.4938A-100000@omnix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > For the server, "s" above appears to be the unconnected (listen) socket. > > The TCP_NODELAY option is not propagated across to accept()ed sockets, so > > you must do the setsockopt on those, not on the listen socket. > > > > They have made the modification on their program to do the setsockopt > on the connect socket but without any success; The 'connect()' socket is only on the client. You must set it on the 'accept()' half (server) as well. > Is there any possibily to track this socketoption to understand > why it diseappear ? getsockopt() will tell you if it's still set. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808171647.KAA06919>