Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:56:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: _<service> users [Was: startup error for pflogd] Message-ID: <20040622155106.C79584@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <p0602041fbcfd2d64fba4@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20040620134437.P94503@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040621164657.GA2544@dragon.nuxi.com> <p0602041fbcfd2d64fba4@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I like _pflogd I like the idea too, but I think its missed the train to get in on 5.x. This breaks a lot of distributed user management since the system users will become desync'd from prior releases, particularly 4.x. Adoption of 5 is a bit slack and I expect to see mixed 4/5 environments for quite a while still. 4 to 5 is going to be a bad enough migration as is; lets not make it worse :) I think its quite doable for 6.x; this gives ports a chance to get on board without having a huge rush before 5.3 hits the street. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622155106.C79584>