Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 04:37:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/picobsd/build picobsd Message-ID: <20040321123727.GB51452@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040321042705.A21986@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200403211046.i2LAkDHK049730@repoman.freebsd.org> <405D7232.30400@freebsd.org> <20040321042705.A21986@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:27:05AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > The advantage of having picobsd and all stripped down variants > of FreeBSD in a port (perhaps with their own category) picobsd has had its own category for 2 years, and it has been sitting there untouched with only one port in it ever since. In fact I've been intending to remove the category soon and move that port back to net/. The usual rule of thumb for a new category is that it must contain 10 ports and have significant reason for a separate existence. Since picobsd seems to be essentially a dead project I'd need to be convinced that the category should remain. Kris --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAXYyHWry0BWjoQKURAsRSAJkBy+rXHHrC3skJVlyA39Qqs4xd7ACgvndP 6/e4QAUv5ifVFoPq8BUtYX4= =3ZYn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040321123727.GB51452>