Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:29:26 +0400 From: Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck problem Message-ID: <50EA8766.3020500@lissyara.su> In-Reply-To: <201301062315.r06NFgH4065878@chez.mckusick.com> References: <201301062315.r06NFgH4065878@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
07.01.2013 03:15, Kirk McKusick пишет: >> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:46:53 +0400 >> From: Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> >> To: current@freebsd.org >> Subject: fsck problem >> >> so, whats reason for use SUJ? > > SUJ is used to speed up the fsck process. If you have had hard disk > errors then it is not able to recover and you need to run fsck in the > old full-fsck way. > > It is not necessary to disable the journal. If fsck runs and fails > it marks the journal as failed so when you rerun fsck it will > run in the old full-fsck mode. Note that running `fsck -y' is not > recommended as that says make this filesystem clean no matter what. > So while you will end up with a clean filesystem, it may be empty > if you had a bad block in the root directory. Instead you should > run fsck and read and think about the questions rather than just > blindly answering them all yes. it's HDD not have bad blocks - it's hardware RAID10 I run fsck -y more than 3 time, before disable journal. it's can't fix error, with enabled journal and, I see it's error not first time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50EA8766.3020500>