Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:56:47 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning(7) request was: Re: Performance boost with kernel options in FBSD 4.6 Message-ID: <3D2E618F.DFA1AC18@herbelot.com> References: <20020710104730.L10343-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <04a601c228dc$c6dbb980$681663cf@icarz.com> <200207111930.g6BJUX5m096974@apollo.backplane.com> <3D2DF09C.B553DE07@herbelot.com> <20020711232540.GA1437@HAL9000.wox.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote: > > Sure modern processors can handle 5000 Hz at the expense of a few > CPU cycles, but do you actually find that dummynet isn't accurate > enough at 1000 Hz? for most applications, dummynet is perfect with its 1ms granularity there are other applications (typically packet blasters) which can use a better time accuracy (this is even better when the internal clocked is slaved to GPS with NTP : you can then have near perfect network transaction replay) TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D2E618F.DFA1AC18>