Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:09:03 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@FreeBSD.org>, "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/orsa Makefile Message-ID: <20110617000903.GC19139@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <4DFA9A65.5050006@missouri.edu> References: <201106162238.p5GMcfrV085514@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110616231146.GA19139@magic.hamla.org> <4DFA940C.2030909@missouri.edu> <20110616234556.GB19139@magic.hamla.org> <4DFA9A65.5050006@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:05:57 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: > >On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 18:38:52 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > >>Sahil Tandon wrote: > >>>On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:38:41 +0000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >>> > >>>>stephen 2011-06-16 22:38:41 UTC > >>>> > >>>> FreeBSD ports repository > >>>> > >>>> Modified files: > >>>> astro/orsa Makefile > >>>> Log: > >>>> - Track updated dependency > >>>> - Bump PORTREVISION > >>> > >>>Please remember to bump other ports that are affected by the math/GiNaC > >>>shlib change. > >> > >>Already done. The only other port that uses math/GiNaC is > >>math/octave-forge-symbolic, and that port was updated at the same > >>time as math/GiNaC. > > > >Really? Then was this wrong a few months ago: > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-March/213042.html > > If you look inside the Makefile of science/mbdyn, it has: > > GINAC "Enable GiNaC-support (not implemented yet)" off > > That is why I decided it wasn't necessary to bump this port's portrevision. > > But now that I think about it, I guess that technically someone > might have decided to build this port with this option set to on, > and maybe I should have checked to see if the port then built even > though it said this option is "not implemented yet". > > This port's maintainer is maho who is one of my mentors, and I did > ask them about this. OK, thanks for explaining your rationale. My confusions stems from seeing bumps in March that were not present this time around. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110617000903.GC19139>