Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 20:00:16 +0200 (CEST) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <ganael.laplanche@martymac.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <ganael.laplanche@martymac.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Ganael LAPLANCHE <ganael.laplanche@martymac.com>, emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_LINUX_RPM and PORTDOCS Message-ID: <20080524175654.M92183@martymac.com> In-Reply-To: <20080524193844.44143bdc@deskjail> References: <20080524073145.M76509@martymac.com> <07923414@ipt.ru> <20080524150909.M12444@martymac.com> <20080524160433.M17651@martymac.com> <15111974@ipt.ru> <20080524171811.M48751@martymac.com> <20080524193844.44143bdc@deskjail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 May 2008 19:38:44 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote
> > Not sure about that because when using AUTOMATIC_PLIST in bsd.linux-rpm.mk,
>
> AUTOMATIC_PLIST is evil. For linux-rpm ports I see absolutely no value
> in using it (we just added it to cut down the noise from one committer,
> one or two ports out of all the ones we have is not going to hurt us
> that much). So don't care about it.
Ok.
> > Great, but I'd say that it should be done a little bit later (may be
> > at pre-install stage). "Extract" stage according to bsd.ports.mk
> > "Unpacks ${DISTFILES} into ${WRKDIR}".
>
> Removing unwanted stuff in post-extract is not uncommon. I don't think
> a patch for linux-rpm.mk with something like this would be a bad
> solution.
Ok, great. As I said earlier, I'll try to provide a patch to bsd.linux-rpm.mk to
handle that.
Thanks for your help :)
Ganaël LAPLANCHE
ganael.laplanche@martymac.com
http://www.martymac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080524175654.M92183>