Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 10:09:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables Message-ID: <199908161709.KAA10454@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9908161900230.34377-100000@freja.webgiro.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> :>2) under "kern.emu.linux"
:> :>3) under "linux"
:> :
:> :I vote for 3.
:> :
:> :--
:> :Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
:> :phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
:> :FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
:>
:> Ditto. Linux emulation is going to become increasingly important,
:> burying deep would just make everyone's life more difficult.
:
:Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree
:for modules (as was already discussed several times..)
:
:Andrzej Bialecki
Yes, this is very true. But I think we are fooling ourselves if we
believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future.
Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-)
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908161709.KAA10454>