Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 23:28:37 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD Message-ID: <20060526232837.113456d0@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20060526230225.GB946@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060526153422.GB25953@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060526183554.25d5cc0d@kan.dnsalias.net> <20060526230225.GB946@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:02:25 -0700 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 06:35:54PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > How does this compare to GCC 4.x mudflap feature? I do not plan to > > include Propolice patch into base system any time soon and will > > object anyone trying to do so due to future maintenance headaches > > this will inevitably create. GCC 4.1.1 import is in the works > > though and should be available shortly. > > > > At one time mudflap would lead to internal compiler errors > on amd64. I haven't tried it in a long time. > > What language frontends do you intend to support when 4.1.1 > comes into the tree? FreeBSD currently has a Fortran 77 > compiler via g77. g77 is no longer supported in the 4.x > series, and its replacement is a Fortran 95 compiler. > > -- > Steve The current plan is to import c/c++ frontends only. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEd8dpQ6z1jMm+XZYRAgeZAKCDyQVMdQf1J1X5eqzEmEHCLvYZ3QCgzf7I FnpZvQ9krrCPKKSWWtoNtks= =RfC+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060526232837.113456d0>