Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:05:47 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: FreeBSD-ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/kde3-i18n-sr@Latn Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <200403092305.47987.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040309215210.GA74157@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040309213129.GA73757@xor.obsecurity.org> <200403092249.10857.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20040309215210.GA74157@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tuesday 09 March 2004 22:52, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > What is portsmon? FWIW, we build this port a few times with the > > kde-freebsd buildcluster (which is similar to bento) and had no problems > > with it. > > http://portsmon.firepipe.net, Mark's amazing port build > cross-reference and summary. Okay, but shouldn't portsmon rather be fixed then? I don't mean to be defiant or anything, but I really think this should be okay as far as any of the traditional ports-tools are concerned, since it passes the cluster logic. Should I still rename? -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBATj+7Xhc68WspdLARAuZVAKCJdjrFlAViqg+S7nxuSv6rtHRvVACfbkZG +GG29Iy+S3ML/g8Nj7sxRSM= =f46I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403092305.47987.michaelnottebrock>