Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 06:14:13 GMT From: Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _iovec.h socket.h uio.h Message-ID: <200212290614.gBT6EDdt020992@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: <20021229003004.B98334@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> > Date: Sun 29 Dec, 2002 > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _iovec.h socket.h uio.h > Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> writes: > > Urk, I wasn't advocating including <sys/types.h> in either <sys/socket.h> > > or <sys/uio.h>, simply pointing out that an application using either of > > the last two will also be including the first. > > Not necessarily; POSIX.1-2001 places no such requirement on applications. Where else is ssize_t defined? Or do you mean that it's valid not to require parameter type definitions to be in scope for unused prototypes? However, we all agree that <sys/types.h> isn't a good place to define struct iovec, so this point is moot. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <mark@thuvia.co.uk> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk> "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- <http://www.calvinandhobbes.com> <http://www.freebsd.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212290614.gBT6EDdt020992>