Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 03:13:17 +0000 From: Adrian Wontroba <aw1@stade.co.uk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? Message-ID: <20041103031316.A95136@titus.hanley.stade.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <41856FAC.2020808@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au>; from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au on Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:05:16AM %2B1100 References: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> <417D604D.4090800@jim-liesl.org> <20041028153756.GB1195@eucla.lemis.com> <41856FAC.2020808@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:05:16AM +1100, Carl Makin wrote: > Do you want to yank it in 5 or 6-CURRENT? There are a *lot* of people > using vinum and yanking it in 5-STABLE would force us all to use the 5.3 > security branch until gvinum caught up. >From my experiences today with setting up a very old machine[1] with 5.3-RC2, I think it would be best to keep both until gvinum had caught up. Vinum can do things which gvinum appears incapable of - such as initialising a RAID-5 plex. -- Adrian Wontroba [1] A Fujitsu M700 4 way Ppro - the state of the art in 1997
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041103031316.A95136>