Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 06:18:29 -0300 From: H <hm@hm.net.br> To: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: flowtable usable or not Message-ID: <4F51E1E5.3000202@hm.net.br> In-Reply-To: <4F512BBB.9000403@ose.nl> References: <20120221143537.Horde.deyFDZjmRSRPQ52pxBIpnLA@webmail.leidinger.net> <BA7FFA2D-DEE6-4FB7-AE26-0BC79CBFD8C0@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4F4BA707.5070608@wasikowski.net> <4F4C3FE7.3040802@FreeBSD.org> <CACqU3MWx3pMMDncvOita-OAgfe=NPKtwKE2WeB_mdcYwozY81Q@mail.gmail.com> <4F4D51CB.2010508@FreeBSD.org> <4F4D5E5D.9040302@FreeBSD.org> <4F4DD288.5060106@FreeBSD.org> <CAHM0Q_O%2BCt6yhRL=B9oxgkL8EgLxZdo7-KFO2C8HqiN1=Kx_bw@mail.gmail.com> <4F4ED889.2070608@FreeBSD.org> <4F500BB9.4040307@FreeBSD.org> <CAHM0Q_OfeB7Kb=pgjGq0uffLJdJROGoCaGz=25Jito-kweAxRQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F5088CA.1090108@FreeBSD.org> <CAHM0Q_MZM6Gn_zPzxz5tLuzPOW=kK9YxqmrLTyitvGfAPhrkbw@mail.gmail.com> <4F510FBD.50008@FreeBSD.org> <4F511496.50106@hm.net.br> <4F512BBB.9000403@ose.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 03/02/2012 07:42 PM, H wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> ... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our >>> developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation. So it has >>> increasingly become an OS where changes are being lobbed over the wall >>> by developers who don't run systems that those changes affect. That's >>> no way to run a railroad. Doug >> wow >> >> since it is not April 1st it must be revelation's day ...:) >> >> is this then the bottomline ? >> >> if [ $using_ports=YES ]; get_screwed($big_time); fi >> >> > Hey people > > There are still a lot of us which might not be smart enough or lack > the resources to help you debug issues but we still use and depend on > FreeBSD, and we test, and hopefully give you some debugging hints > > I have some production servers running on STABLE and even some on > CURRENT to stress our developers, but most run RELEASE and use > freebsd-update > > Keep up the good work, it makes me a more confident sysadmin > Ports is the best thing happening to me after going through al the apt > and other stuff you talk like the wind blows my friend ... remembering your own most recent words in another occasion what certainly do not match your last sentence ... >/ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen at ose.nl <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>>; wrote: />/ />/ > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500 />/ > David Jackson <djackson452 at gmail.com <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>>; wrote: />/ > />/ > > I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages />/ > > on Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried: />/ > > /... >/ > > />/ > > All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in an />/ > > unuseable state. />/ > /.... >/ />/ />/ I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to />/ compile anything, it tends to take far too long to compile programs />/ and would rather install some packages and have it all work right />/ away. Binary packages are a big time saver and are more efficient. It />/ should be easy for FreeBSD to make it easy to install the most recent />/ versions of all binary packages, its beyond belief they cannot pull />/ off such a simple ans straight forward, and basic part of any OS. / -- H [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9R4eUACgkQvKVfg5xjCDytNwCbBIchuhBbZFNLzZ0aemIavAia vgcAoKDdmWmagK4TeRSYXBQxeLZxMwe0 =39jw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F51E1E5.3000202>