Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208561] [NEW PORT] sysutils/datadog: Datadog Cloud-Scale Monitoring agent Message-ID: <bug-208561-21822-UGDFjiISkC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208561-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208561-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208561 --- Comment #14 from Dave Cottlehuber <dch@freebsd.org> --- thanks uros for the work here! Other than a few tidy-ups this is a fantastic port. I'm tweaking it for v7 & USES=go:modules but other than that LGTM. on v7, there's 1 (docker related) dependency that doesn't fetch correctly; help wanted on figuring out how to manage that. Is it sufficient to remove the line from modules, and the invoke ... command parameters? https://git.sr.ht/~dch/ports/tree/feature/datadog I'll add a patch tomorrow from this branch after some further work. Assuming that works, it needs to respect hier(7) to land in ports. Hopefully we can do this with some gentle patches in the source. assuming /usr/local/bin/dd-agent or similar, does it make more sense to use /var/run/datadog/... or /var/db/datadog/... for example for its runtime files? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208561-21822-UGDFjiISkC>
