Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 01:18:19 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <20040524001819.GA2713@voi.aagh.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* JG (amd64list@jpgsworld.com) wrote: > I use 30 10000 for everything because I feel it simulates a more > realistic load on the server (But I could be wrong). It takes a good > 2-4 minutes between tests though.. :( Well, super-smack isn't that effecient; with 30 clients you'll be getting 30 copies of it (perl I think) sucking down millions of records each; that saps a lot of power away from MySQL, so poor performance is to be expected. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524001819.GA2713>