Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:00:12 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Cc:        ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: Today is not a good day for -current on alpha
Message-ID:  <20030820190012.GA19155@ns1.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030820180736.GB3831@freebie.xs4all.nl>
References:  <20030818201545.GA1558@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20030820171023.GA38172@cicely5.cicely.de> <20030820180736.GB3831@freebie.xs4all.nl>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:07:36PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:10:24PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:15:45PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > Second time today on my quad AS4100:
> > > 
> > > db> trace
> > > sysctl_vm_zone() at sysctl_vm_zone+0x370
> > > sysctl_root() at sysctl_root+0x16c
> > > userland_sysctl() at userland_sysctl+0x170
> > > __sysctl() at __sysctl+0xe8
> > > syscall() at syscall+0x3b8
> > > XentSys() at XentSys+0x64
> > > --- syscall (202, FreeBSD ELF64, __sysctl) ---
> > > --- user mode ---
> > > db> 
> > 
> > Was this a missalignment panic?
> > I get one reproduceable when going multi with a kernel from 17th.
> > Trace looks the same.
> 
> No, it was:
> 
>  > ^M
>  >     trap entry     = 0x2 (memory management fault)^M
>  >     cpuid          = 1^M

JFYI: both may be the result of the same bug. Uninitialized
variables (pointers) have a tendency to cause different kinds
of faults depending on the garbage.

That's all I have to say about it
	-- Forrest Gump

:-)

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030820190012.GA19155>