Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210031654560.13739-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021003205237.GB12130@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > Can you try the patch at:
> > 
> >   http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs
> > 
> 
> I'll try it a bit later, but now have a question about it: why you 
> redefine _MC_FP* constants? They are for different fields in anycase.

So that something is set in the upper-half of the word.  These
locations (mc_fpformat and mc_ownedfp) were previously occupied
by FPU control and status words which are only 16 bits.  So in
case an older application/library (like libc_r) managed to save
a FP control or status word in these locations, it couldn't
possibly match something bigger than 16 bits.

-- 
Dan Eischen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10210031654560.13739-100000>