Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:54:20 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Espen Oyslebo <oys@powertech.no>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd) Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010127225302.01e75660@marble.sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:20 PM 1/27/2001 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
>Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is there any
>point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it ain't broken).
Actually, I have found ipnat to be *much* faster for my home DSL
connection. My gateway is a lowly Pentium 133 and I can only get full rate
net throughput use ipnat. natd is about 33% slower than ipnat for my setup
on PPPoE.
---Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Network Administration, mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20010127225302.01e75660>