Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:20:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Ceri <setantae@submonkey.net>
To:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: docs/32373: Bad ifconfig(8) alias advice in FAQ 10.9
Message-ID:  <200111291620.fATGK2230872@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/32373; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ceri <setantae@submonkey.net>
To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/32373: Bad ifconfig(8) alias advice in FAQ 10.9
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:18:15 +0000

 On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:37:05AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
 > If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
 > 
 > > Newer ifconfig(8) supports the address/bits syntax.  :-)
 > 
 > You're quite right, but using the "netmask" keyword in the example will
 > ensure that it still works for older versions.  Maybe use the newer 
 > syntax as an alternative?  (I'm not sure whether or not it's worth the 
 > extra space.)
 
 Hmm, I'm not sure that it is (we're not supposed to be duplicating the
 manpages).
 
 Could do with a few more opinions if anybody has them ?
 
 Ceri
 
 -- 
 keep a mild groove on

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111291620.fATGK2230872>