Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 16:41:44 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: obrien@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h Message-ID: <199702222141.QAA00382@hda.hda.com> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970222201055.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Feb 22, 97 08:10:55 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > obrien 97/02/16 12:55:34 > > > > Modified: contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h > > Log: > > Add _BSD4_4 as a predefined symbol. > > Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) suggested this is the most approate symbol > > to use. > > > > 2.2-R candidate. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.2 +1 -1 src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd-elf.h > > 1.4 +1 -1 src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd.h > > What ever came out of this discussion? 2.2 candidate, or dead end? This doesn't go in gcc. It goes nowhere or in <unistd.h>. I'd put it in <unistd.h> and recommend it as the "this is a POSIXised modern BSD" test macro. -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702222141.QAA00382>