Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:26:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Don <don@calis.blacksun.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>, Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@cgilh.chel.su>, Chuck Youse <cyouse@paradox.nexuslabs.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910271725120.35683-100000@calis.blacksun.org> In-Reply-To: <199910271938.MAA35962@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> When Kirk gets his softupdates/filesystem-checkmarking code working we > are going to be a step up from anything linux could hope to accomplish > in the filesystem arena because we will then be able to reliably dump, > checkmark, AND sanity-check the filesystem on a live (and busy) system. I would really like to see the finished product from Kirk especially given all of the work he has already done. However, what will xfs mean to linux? -don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9910271725120.35683-100000>