Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:18:14 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config main.c Message-ID: <20050427151814.GA25876@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050425151203.GA43724@ip.net.ua> References: <200504221742.j3MHgoG9084110@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050424201534.GA74964@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050425050656.GA42466@ip.net.ua> <20050425143043.GA93171@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050425151203.GA43724@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 06:12:03PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:30:43AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > If 'make depend' isn't 100% garenteed to work, we should make sure it > > 100% works. > > > I have a patch in the works that should solve this. I hope to post it > later today (local time) for review. > > > > If you need automation, use "make buildkernel", or stop using NO_CLEAN. > > > > I didn't use 'NO_CLEAN' for the kernel build, yet you keep bringing up > > that I am. > > > You don't listen then. Yes you didn't use the NO_CLEAN, but when you > do "config FOO; cd ../compile/FOO; make depend; make" you effectively > do NOT run "make clean" or "make cleandepend", that's why I keep > saying NO_CLEAN. If you have used "make buildkernel" without NO_CLEAN > you wouldn't have ran into this problem. Well then speak accurately. I don't use NO_CLEAN - it isn't in my environment nor on my command line, I build kernels the "traditional way". That I would have clearly understood. > In the above, NO_CLEAN means that NO "make clean" (or at a minimum > "make cleandepend") was run. Please explictly state 'NO "make clean"' next time. thanks, -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050427151814.GA25876>