Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 12:37:46 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c Message-ID: <XFMail.010705123746.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20010705122647.K371@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Jul-01 Greg Lehey wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 16:04:02 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:39:43PM -0500, Greg Lehey wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 13:44:10 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> >>>> On 04-Jul-01 Greg Lehey wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, 3 July 2001 at 0:53:35 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>>>>> jhb 2001/07/03 00:53:35 PDT >>>>>> >>>>>> Modified files: >>>>>> sys/kern kern_synch.c >>>>>> Log: >>>>>> Axe spl's that are covered by the sched_lock (and have been for quite >>>>>> some time.) >>>>> >>>>> I still get very confused when people talk about spls in -CURRENT. >>>> >>>> They are still there even if they are stub functions. I'm just axeing >>>> some of >>>> the stubs that have been fully replaced. >>> >>> OK, I can see the point if this is code which can be MFCd. But by the >>> looks of it this isn't the case here. So what good does it do? >> >> You'd prefer we left the NOP code in the tree until the end of time? > > I'm not sure if you understand. That's what this commit does, sort > of. I'm just wondering why. Err, I _removed_ the spl's. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010705123746.jhb>