Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:06:30 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Subject: Re: Trivial questions about CNTL-ALT-DEL and CNTL-ALT-BACKSPACE Message-ID: <20091116010630.0b8f498a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4B009370.1040002@otenet.gr> References: <42052.1258327169@tristatelogic.com> <4B009370.1040002@otenet.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:49:04 +0200, Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> wrote: > By the way Xorg configuration becomes more and more elusive. Initially, > DontZap was enough. Then it had no effect at all and the fdi file was > needed. Now seems both are needed. What's next? If this continues, I'll run my 5.4-p8 workstation with "old fashioned" X (already X.org) until I die. :-) No, honestly: X is going to be more and more annoying. Have you noticed the long startup time? Nearly a half minute (!!!) on a 1.5 GHz system! I know that there is lots of work done to make life easier for X developers, especially getting rid of many OS specific stuff, but... Finally, sliding more off-topic: Not only X gets slower with each release, the same applies for almost all X applications, except the "old fashioned" ones. Sad. Just: Sad. Thanks for your patience so I could say this. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091116010630.0b8f498a.freebsd>