Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jul 1999 17:31:09 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>
Cc:        Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... 
Message-ID:  <199907312331.RAA94627@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 31 Jul 1999 19:34:10 %2B0200." <19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de> 
References:  <19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de>  <19990731190814.A18402@cicely8.cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907311316430.94119-100000@penelope.skunk.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes:
: Maybe a set of sysctls with a switch to off only behavour would be a
: better way.

Actually, a better way would be to have the interfaces to the network
stack that would handle this stuff w/o needing to resort to bpf.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907312331.RAA94627>