Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 13:54:35 -0700 From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> To: <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>, "Takayoshi Kochi" <kochi@netbsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree Message-ID: <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3CD8@orsmsx405.jf.intel.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Here's what we released: #define ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID 0x0001 #define ACPI_FIRST_TABLE_ID 0xF000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate@root.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:00 AM > To: Takayoshi Kochi > Cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org; yosimoto@waishi.jp; current@freebsd.org > Subject: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree >=20 > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote: > > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed > > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's, > > I think. > > > > Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0, > > otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict. > > > > I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel, > > but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the > > changes are intended). > > > > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with > > some appropriate option. >=20 > Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I > would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead > stick to hard-coding the defaults. This is the safer way for 5.1R. We > will do a new import and more fixes after the release. >=20 > -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3CD8>