Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:40:35 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile) Message-ID: <20080221154035.GR57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080221153026.GB1022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> References: <20080221131209.GA2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221140247.GC2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221143351.GP57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <fpk4fa$gj0$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080221153026.GB1022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Kai Wang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > > Shall the crossbuild for CURRENT work on RELENG_[67] ? If not, this is a > > > huge regression. > > > > Why wouldn't it, unless you're building amd64 CURRENT on i386 > > RELENG_[67] or a similar combination? > > That's right... I didn't consider this situation before... > Building amd64 CURRENT on i386 RELENG_[67] won't work. I'll see what > I can do, I think we probably need revert back to let Binutils ar to > handle the cross build. Yes, please. This is critical for my work. > My Makefile knowledge is very poor, is there a way to let the build > system use Binutils 'ar' in the building process but later install > it as 'gar'? > > Thanks, > -- > Kai [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAke9m3IACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iVOQCeM5QGQSXhnnESTmefbnJNXgJe 8i4AnjZEdO/kY+LnTE2nDE5XLLHFQRAz =HRVE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080221154035.GR57756>