Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:27:11 +0000 From: "eugen_grosbein.net (Eugene Grosbein)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection Message-ID: <ec4e07f230642d7eea5e0c5c17f9aef2@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
eugen_grosbein.net marked an inline comment as done. eugen_grosbein.net added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > mav wrote in if_stf.c:383 > Wouldn't it be better to use in_localip() here instead of code duplication? Or I miss something? in_localip() may be better, I just wished to make the patch as clear as possible minizing changes for first revision. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: eugen_grosbein.net, ae, avg, mav, rwatson Cc: bz, imp, freebsd-net-list
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ec4e07f230642d7eea5e0c5c17f9aef2>