Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:28:04 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org> Cc: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org>, doc@freebsd.org, doceng@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN Message-ID: <CADLo8394urEE2q1ynU56ndhZLDKtGVesGUnu5FJdcMtO3sPDeg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111007221736.GQ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F0AA2.3020704@freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110072203320.17415@ury.york.ac.uk> <20111007221736.GQ26743@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 October 2011 23:17, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 22:15:57 +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: >> > > I haven't really thought that through to the end, but setting up a >> > > separate svn repo just seems silly to me and is another administrati= ve >> > > overhead. ports might be special enough (due to sheer size) to justi= fy a >> > > separate repo/machine, but not doc/www. >> >> It may actually be easier, as all the infrastructure from the src repo c= an >> possibly be reused easily. =A0Combining them may be harder as more work >> would presumably need to be done on sorting out ACLs for src and doc >> committers, etc? > > Not really, it's just a couple of paths more. Every doc and ports > committer has write access to parts of the src tree, otherwise they > couldn't update the committers.dot or calender.freebsd entries > themselves. > Parts of the src tree? All the trees are free-for-all for anyone, it's just you get a nice suspiscious-looking THIS COMMITTER DOESN'T BELONG HERE tag in the commit message! Example: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2011-September/042703.html Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo8394urEE2q1ynU56ndhZLDKtGVesGUnu5FJdcMtO3sPDeg>