Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:47:25 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org Cc: brooks@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ivoras@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, trasz@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r192800 - in head/sys: cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/acl cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs cddl/contrib/opensolaris/u... Message-ID: <20090526.184725.970724007.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262114090.23177@fledge.watson.org> References: <9bbcef730905260624x289af079ue8524e821c1dc891@mail.gmail.com> <20090526200925.GA41682@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262114090.23177@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262114090.23177@fledge.watson.org>
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
:
: On Tue, 26 May 2009, Brooks Davis wrote:
:
: >>> Cute though this BSD license variation is, I'm pretty sure it's not on the
: >>> approved license list. ??Sticking to the standard license templates
: >>> potentially saves significant trouble later -- especially when people
: >>
: >> Hmm, I'm sure that there exists some SVN magic which would allow authors to
: >> enter something
: >>
: >> $BSDL2 Charlie Root 2008,2009$
: >>
: >> and it expands to a perfect boilerplate on checkout :)
: >
: > Such a change would result in a repository filled without license blocks.
: > This might be appropriate in a corporate setting, but isn't worth
: > considering here since copies of the repo would lack correct attributions.
:
: I'd assumed that it was a tongue-in-cheek proposal, myself :-).
:
: (It is, right?)
I assumed it as well, but just in case posted my "well, this won't
work" message...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090526.184725.970724007.imp>