Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:00:40 +1000 (EST) From: Andy Farkas <andyf@speednet.com.au> To: Seishi Hiragushi <s-hrgsh@lapis.plala.or.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current: network collition increase Message-ID: <20030903085737.L98839-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030902071657.1e94e2b4.s-hrgsh@lapis.plala.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Seishi Hiragushi wrote:
> I noticed that network collition increase, in log of 7/26.
> Such still a state continues.
> What became like this owing to?
>
> 5.1-CURRENT-20030720 (daily run 7/26):
> Network interface status:
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
> dc0 1500 <Link#1> 00:90:cc:a2:59:56 383420 27 441061 0 260568
> dc0 1500 192.168.200 ***************** 374698 - 431325 - -
> dc1 1500 <Link#2> 00:c0:ca:10:91:89 190866 0 136617 4124 70128
...
> dc0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.200.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.200.255
> inet6 fe80::2c0:caff:fe10:918c%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> ether 00:c0:ca:10:91:8c
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
> status: active
I am seeing the same thing:
team2# netstat -inr
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
dc0 1500 <Link#1> 00:00:e8:89:b9:66 1205836 0 899804 171173 2909941
dc0 1500 172.22.2/28 172.22.2.12 1205560 - 899768 - -
lo0 16384 <Link#2> 52 0 52 0 0
lo0 16384 127 127.0.0.1 52 - 52 - -
team2#
team2# ifconfig dc0
dc0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 172.22.2.12 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 172.22.2.15
ether 00:00:e8:89:b9:66
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
Collisions shouldn't happen on a full-duplex link?
--
:{ andyf@speednet.com.au
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
Speednet Communications
http://www.speednet.com.au/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030903085737.L98839-100000>