Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:37:15 +0300 From: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> To: David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <4FC9ECDB.30707@digsys.bg> In-Reply-To: <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> <CAOjFWZ7rq_NaAdaKL6Woi-ATy390ax20KWO=V_Jpf9-vJWwgLg@mail.gmail.com> <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg> <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 02.06.12 09:23, David Magda wrote: > On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > >> On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash<fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems. >>> So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. >>> >> How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate down nodes better than ZFS? > Gluster ~ NFS++. So Gluster is basically ZFS with NFS frontend? Something readily available in FreeBSD. The clients don't even have to learn new file sharing protocol. Danielhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC9ECDB.30707>