Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:37:15 +0300 From: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> To: David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <4FC9ECDB.30707@digsys.bg> In-Reply-To: <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> <CAOjFWZ7rq_NaAdaKL6Woi-ATy390ax20KWO=V_Jpf9-vJWwgLg@mail.gmail.com> <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg> <C141E1AD-DE21-4F9F-B40E-5C72A3453AB5@ee.ryerson.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02.06.12 09:23, David Magda wrote: > On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > >> On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash<fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems. >>> So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. >>> >> How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate down nodes better than ZFS? > Gluster ~ NFS++. So Gluster is basically ZFS with NFS frontend? Something readily available in FreeBSD. The clients don't even have to learn new file sharing protocol. Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC9ECDB.30707>