Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:00:47 -0400 From: David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca> To: Marcin Wisnicki <mwisnicki+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't get ntp to work Message-ID: <A7753C8E-4F5A-42E7-9DF6-686C3BDCCB0F@ee.ryerson.ca> In-Reply-To: <n001r3$oql$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <n001r3$oql$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 08:03, Marcin Wisnicki = <mwisnicki+freebsd@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > My ntpd stopped synchronizing clock sometime ago (default ntp.conf). >=20 > To debug the problem I've tried running ntpdate and got strange = results: >=20 >> # ntpdate 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org >> 18 Oct 13:53:14 ntpdate[55102]: no server suitable for = synchronization found >> =09 >> # ntpdate -u 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org >> 18 Oct 13:53:19 ntpdate[55119]: adjust time server 193.25.222.240 = offset 0.002672 sec >=20 >=20 > This would point to broken firewall BUT: >=20 >> # nmap -p123 -sU 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org >>=20 >> Starting Nmap 6.49BETA5 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2015-10-18 13:52 CEST >> Nmap scan report for 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org (193.25.222.240) >> Host is up (0.027s latency). >> Other addresses for 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org (not scanned): 94.154.96.7 = 95.158.95.123 46.175.224.7 >> rDNS record for 193.25.222.240: afrodyta.complex.net.pl >> PORT STATE SERVICE >> 123/udp open ntp >>=20 >> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.64 seconds >=20 > So there is nothing blocking the traffic. >=20 > Any ideas ? Both =E2=80=9Cnmap" and =E2=80=9Cntpdate -u=E2=80=9D would use an = unprivileged, ephemeral port, while ntpd(8) and a regular run of = ntpdate(8) would use UDP 123 as the source port. Perhaps there is a = firewall issue with source ports lower than 1024?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A7753C8E-4F5A-42E7-9DF6-686C3BDCCB0F>