Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:40:41 +0100 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>, yarodin@gmail.com, peter@vereshagin.org, gabor@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20080110124041.GC80526@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <200712310028.lBV0S5On056424@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200712310028.lBV0S5On056424@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:28:05AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > miwi 2007-12-31 00:28:05 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > www Makefile > Added files: > www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > Log: > FCGI::ProcManager is used to serve as a FastCGI process manager. By > re-implementing it in perl, developers can more finely tune performance in > their web applications, and can take advantage of copy-on-write semantics > prevalent in UNIX kernel process management. The process manager should > be invoked before the caller''s request loop > > WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/FCGI-ProcManager/ > > PR: ports/119009 > Submitted by: Peter <peter at vereshagin.org> > > Revision Changes Path > 1.1933 +1 -0 ports/www/Makefile > 1.1 +22 -0 ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager/Makefile (new) > 1.1 +3 -0 ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager/distinfo (new) > 1.1 +7 -0 ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager/pkg-descr (new) > 1.1 +5 -0 ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager/pkg-plist (new) Why this ever got added? There is an identical port www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager. Now we are getting PRs with updates to this one (see 119300), where PR authors *complain* about someone updating "the wrong port", refering to gabor's update of www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager recently... What a mess. I'd like committers adding new ports to be a *bit* more careful and verify that the port is indeed *new*. It can be argued that the "new" name is better that the "old" one, but this is an entirely separate can of worm. Grrrr. Cheers, \Anton. -- We're going for 'working' here. 'clean' is for people with skills... -- Flemming Jacobsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080110124041.GC80526>